I am happy to report that I will be giving a full-day workshop (seminar) at this year's Project Management Institute Conference on May 16 here in San Diego. The workshop is titled "Leading Teams to High Performance" and you can read a little more about it here.
(http://pmi-sd.org/index.php/conference/menu-conf-seminars).
Learn more about the this year's conference here.
(http://pmi-sd.org/index.php/conference/menu-conf-welcome)
Learn more about the OUTSTANDING PMI Organization in San Diego here.
(http://pmi-sd.org/)
Insist on great business results! Go to Pathfinder Communication
Thursday, April 24, 2014
Creating a Productive Communication Environment
Defensiveness is not productive. May seem obvious once it
is said like that, but making something explicit isn’t such a bad thing –
especially if something is not obvious to the person you are speaking to.
Defensiveness is the normal and correct action when someone is feeling
attacked.
Notice I didn’t say being attacked – I said FEELING
attacked.
I have found many times that, in my distant past, I was capable
of feeling attacked when, in reality, I was not. I have certainly had people
tell me (again in the past) that they felt I was attacking them when I wasn’t.
When I felt attacked, I would demonstrate all sorts of clever behaviors to
distance myself from the perceived danger – but whatever behavior I chose, the
lack of safety I felt would KILL my willingness to continue honestly and openly
continuing with the discussion. My goal was to get out alive.
So – communication stops being productive when either
party feels a lack of trust or safety in the environment.
There are other elements of a productive communication
environment than the risk of attack, of course. What if the other person isn’t
attacking us at all – but we don’t believe that they care about what we’re
saying? Or that they do care, but they aren’t open to try anything other than
their current idea? That doesn’t feel very productive, and we may act out when
we sense this happening (acting out unspoken feelings is the whole basis of the
study of body language, by the way – we all do it). Sometimes we act out
verbally, too, and if the other person feels attacked by this, things spiral
the wrong way.
A productive communication environment is one in which:
·
It is safe to tell the truth
·
We intend to arrive at the conclusion that satisfies
our most important objectives
·
We intend to arrive at the conclusion that is
not objectionable to any stakeholder
One of the ways we can make the communication environment
productive is be explicit about these things and mean them. To ENSURE that
everyone in the conversation knows EXPLICITLY (by saying it) that it is safe to
tell the truth hear – we need to be free to share exactly what we think. I know
how scary that sounds (and I know why you picture the conversation immediately
turning into a fight) when you think of saying it, but sometimes it’s best to
make it obvious, and this is one of those times.
Once you and the people you are speaking with believe the
three bullets I wrote above, then you (not they) need to know how to facilitate
that conversation. I say “you” because it only takes ONE competent communicator
in the room to handle most any situation, and I have picked YOU to be the
competent communicator.
Insist on great business results! Go to Pathfinder Communication
Saturday, April 12, 2014
Not tools so much as an environment...
I spent a big percentage of the last few years teaching
others what I have learned about making communication at work productive. I was
asked a while ago by one of my clients “What are the tools used and the responsibilities
of each person engaged in a productive conversation?”
It seems that this is the way we like to imagine these
conversations being held – each of us having an equal part in the conversation
and the outcome. I believe that particular expectation is an obstacle to
productive communication, and that by changing that expectation of “equal
participation” one can begin to make things productive.
Most of us recognize that there will naturally be differences
between people in our work place. That is, in almost any pairing of two people one
person is a better listener, or more articulate, or more withdrawn, or more
distracted…… the list of differences is quite long.
When we walk away from a conversation thinking that the
other party doesn’t listen, doesn’t speak up, is scary to talk to …. THAT is
when we recognize the differences and have bad feelings. The bad feelings are
because our needs weren’t met – we NEEDED them to be effective and they weren’t
which leaves us unsatisfied with the conversation. Further, it seems that this THEIR
fault and is not fixable unless they change.
But it IS – we just have to change the “equal
participation” expectation. And understanding that makes it easier to describe
the use of the “tools”.
There is a kind of “ideal” environment for conducting
conversations. That environment is not very necessary when we are discussing
the “easy” things – non-controversial, obvious, simple, low-impact topics – and
vital when we are discussing the hard things – poor performance or failures,
bad news, high-impact things. In other words, maintaining the environment to
conduct difficult conversations becomes most important at the very same time
that the topics demand the most focus. If we don’t appreciate maintaining the
right environment, or if we don’t know how, it is easy to think that TOPIC or
the PEOPLE involved are what made the conversation implode. But usually, it is
that we didn’t maintain a good environment.
Communication tools
and techniques are used to promote the optimum environment. Next week, we’ll
talk about what that environment looks like exactly, and then discuss the tools
used to create it.
Insist on great business results! Go to Pathfinder Communication
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)